Introduction to WRAP
CE 394K.2 – Surface Water Hydrology
University of Texas at Austin – Spring, 1999
Prepared by: David Mason
#1)
-
Distribution of Streamflows for Control Points A10 and A40 for 1976
|
FLOW FOR YEAR 1976 IN AC-FT
|
|
Time
|
A10
|
A40
|
|
Jan
|
0
|
0
|
|
Feb
|
37
|
25
|
|
Mar
|
5642
|
5105
|
|
Apr
|
57365
|
52850
|
|
May
|
36275
|
33339
|
|
Jun
|
13523
|
12344
|
|
Jul
|
39511
|
36331
|
|
Aug
|
425
|
362
|
|
Sep
|
4432
|
3998
|
|
Oct
|
23764
|
21784
|
|
Nov
|
3532
|
3176
|
|
Dec
|
50562
|
46553
|
-
The results are as expected. The flows at A10 are higher since the point
is located further downstream in the system. Also, we can see that the
flow is higher in the summer months when there is more rain falling on
the basin.
-
Use of NRCS Flow Redistribution Method to Calculated Flow at Unknown
Point
|
CP
|
AREA (square miles)
|
CN
|
PRECIP (in)
|
|
A10
|
541.01
|
69.6
|
42.8
|
|
A40
|
504.58
|
69.4
|
42.7
|
-
Solving by the quadratic equation gives P = 1.037 in.
-
Therefore, Q40 by NRCS method is approximately equal to the
138 acre-ft/mo calculated by WRAP.
The simple drainage area ratio analysis gives the following data:
where a =
-
Q40 by the drainage area ratio method is approximately equal
to 158.55 acre-ft/mo.
The percent difference between the two methods is as follows:
% diff =
13.2%
#2)
-
The senior water right holder is the City of Wolfe City
-
The seniority of this water right means that it is entitled to all of
its water before anyone else gets theirs.
#3) Naturalized, Unappropriated and Diverted Flows
The average annual naturalized and unappropriated flows out of the basin
can be found from the data in the file output1.
-
NATURALIZED = 311,881 AC-FT/YR, UNAPPROPRIATED = 150,561 AC-FT/YR
Diverted or Appropriated flow can be calculated by taking the difference
between naturalized and unappropriated
-
APPROPRIATED = 311,881 - 150,561 = 161,320 AC-FT/YR
-
% DIVERTED = 161,320/311,881 = 51.7%
Below is a plot of the annual volume of water that is appropriated as a
function of naturalized flow:
-
As you can see by the scatter in the data, the appropriated water is not
constant from year to year. If it was, you would be able to see some sort
of correlation in the data points (i.e. it would plot as a straight line).
#4) Water Availability Planning
-
After running the example2 file through TABLES, a plot was made of the
End of Period Storage as a function of time (see below):
-
From the plot and the data in the tables, we can see that the storage goes
to zero between October of 1955 and January of 1957. It also breifly goes
to zero again during the summer of 1964.
-
The fact that the storage goes to zero implies that the supply of water
to Irving was not very reliable. A drought during that time caused the
depletion of the reservoir storage, and thus limited the supply of water
to that area of Texas for a period of 16 months.
-
Below is a table displaying the impacts of the new water right on the existing
water right holders:
|
WITHOUT NEW W.R.
|
WITH NEW W.R.
|
DIFFERENCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERMITTED
|
MEAN
|
|
PERMITTED
|
MEAN
|
|
|
NAME
|
DIVERSION
|
SHORTAGE
|
NAME
|
DIVERSION
|
SHORTAGE
|
SHORTAGE
|
|
(AC-FT/YR)
|
(AC-FT/YR)
|
|
(AC-FT/YR)
|
(AC-FT/YR)
|
(AC-FT/YR)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4795_1
|
69
|
0.4
|
4795_1
|
69
|
0.4
|
0
|
|
4795_2
|
231.8
|
2.2
|
4795_2
|
231.8
|
2.2
|
0
|
|
4799M
|
44820
|
55.6
|
4799M
|
44820
|
561.2
|
-505.6
|
|
4799I
|
9179.5
|
40.6
|
4799I
|
9179.5
|
148.7
|
-108.1
|
|
4798
|
53999.8
|
190.2
|
4798
|
53999.8
|
945.3
|
-755.1
|
|
4797AM
|
26960.3
|
153.3
|
4797AM
|
26960.3
|
583.1
|
-429.8
|
|
4797AI
|
11559.6
|
68.3
|
4797AI
|
11559.6
|
255.6
|
-187.3
|
|
4797BM
|
0
|
0
|
4797BM
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
4797BI
|
0
|
0
|
4797BI
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
4796_1
|
80.1
|
33.5
|
4796_1
|
80.1
|
41
|
-7.5
|
|
IF4799
|
2835.8
|
21.4
|
IF4799
|
2969.7
|
80.1
|
-58.7
|
|
4800
|
272.9
|
10.2
|
4800
|
272.9
|
10.2
|
0
|
|
4796_2
|
0
|
0
|
4796_2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
4395
|
1518
|
0
|
4395
|
1518
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
5000
|
36000
|
832
|
N/A
|
-
The new water right does not affect the reliability of supply to the other
water right holders in the basin apart from those drawing from Chapman
Reservoir. Since this water right would be the most junior in the basin,
the other water rights are entitled to their water before WR5000 gets its
water. It affects the water rights drawing from Chapman Reservoir because
they are all pulling water from the same source.